Watch Juno interview.
Read every turn. Juno follows the participant's language, probes the vague answer and keeps the study brief in view — with the transcript open for you to judge.
Researchers
Run the research you don't have time for — without lowering the bar.
Juno conducts adaptive interviews, follows contradiction and keeps the reasoning open to inspection — so you can cover more ground and still defend the method.
The studies you'd hand a researcher.
Valuable work keeps slipping when the team is at capacity. Brief Juno on the studies that deserve proper interviewing and a synthesis you can inspect.
Synthesis you can pull apart.
Juno separates a recurring pattern from a one-off, surfaces the case that breaks the theme and keeps the supporting interviews close — so you can interrogate the reasoning, not just read a summary.
Debrief, and push back.
Ask what weakens the theme, where segments diverge or what evidence would change the conclusion. Juno answers from the study and keeps the source material in reach.
Method you can inspect, direct, and defend.
Method over anecdote
Juno follows published interviewing and synthesis standards, looks for mechanisms rather than memorable lines, and keeps disconfirming evidence visible.
Yours to direct
Set the brief, add verbatim questions that must be asked word-for-word, and review the interviews and synthesis before sharing the work.
Reasoning in the open
Open a finding, inspect the supporting quotes and transcript context, and challenge the interpretation in the debrief.
25+ years of research craft.
Encoded into Juno.
This is the part you'll scrutinise hardest — so we wrote it all down. Read exactly how Juno questions, who it talks to, and how it's kept honest.
Detailed interview standards Juno applies across each brief, interview, and synthesis.
Read the standardPanel ethics, incentives, consent, and respectful participation controls.
Read the standardPublished privacy, redaction, and participant-wellbeing standards for reviewing study fit.
Read the standardCase studies
What Australians really think about climate
How G+S Communications used Juno to run 200 qualitative interviews and create Climate Sentiment in Australia 2025, a national study that shows what Australians really think about climate action.
G+S Communications · 200 interviews
Finding barriers to conversion
How Juno helped StoryTribe uncover what stopped users upgrading, enabling targeted fixes that lifted conversion.
StoryTribe
The questions you're actually asking
Read the Competencies page, watch the interview exchange and inspect the transcripts. Judge the moves and the evidence rather than taking a comparison on faith.
Juno is instructed and evaluated to avoid leading questions. The transcript stays available so you can review how each question was framed.
Yes — set the brief, add verbatim questions asked word-for-word, and review the work before it is shared.
Findings keep their supporting quotes and transcript context close, while the synthesis calls out contradictions and disconfirming cases.
Review the interview evidence, coverage and available quality signals before accepting the synthesis. Ask how quality scoring is configured for your study.
Cover more of your without lowering the bar.
Brief Juno, then inspect the interview, the synthesis, and the evidence behind it.